For the love of humanity
Protecting human minds and bodies in the age of neurotechnology.
A proposed public-interest mission for responsible science, independent protective research, compassionate support, and rights that keep pace with invention.
The moment we're in
Brain–computer interfaces and neural stimulation are already subjects of clinical research and public policy. Their promise is real: communication, movement, and relief for people living with serious conditions. So are the questions about consent, mental privacy, agency, security, and misuse.
The OECD adopted its Recommendation on Responsible Innovation in Neurotechnology on 11 December 2019. Its nine principles include safety assessment, stewardship of personal brain data, societal deliberation, and anticipating misuse.
OECD recommendation ↗Chile's Law 21.383 amended Article 19 in 2021, requiring scientific and technological development to respect life and physical and mental integrity, with special protection for brain activity and information derived from it.
English translation of the law ↗On 11 November 2025, UNESCO adopted its Recommendation on the Ethics of Neurotechnology. It asks Member States to act and to involve research, public, private, and civil-society institutions in implementation.
UNESCO recommendation ↗NIH-highlighted research shows implanted BCIs translating neural signals into speech for people with paralysis. These systems are studied with identified participants, hardware, calibration, and clinical oversight.
NIH research summary ↗International recommendations are an important start, but principles alone do not create detection standards, remedies, independent testing capacity, or enforceable protections in every jurisdiction. Governance and protective engineering must develop alongside capability.
The technology
The mission takes concerns about non-consensual neural monitoring, stimulation, and bodily harm seriously without turning unanswered questions into settled facts. Different kinds of evidence belong in different columns.
Current BCIs can record limited neural signals with sensors placed on or implanted in the body, then use algorithms to translate patterns into commands or speech. Stimulation technologies can influence neural activity under defined technical and clinical conditions.
Some people report involuntary sensations, perceived monitoring, loss of bodily autonomy, or technology-related attacks. Those accounts are real reports from people and deserve compassion, careful documentation, and protection from ridicule or exploitation.
Publicly available evidence does not establish covert, non-contact technology capable of reading or controlling a specific person's thoughts or body at unlimited distance. Claims of that kind require testable hypotheses, independent replication, and transparent evidence.
What we're building
OneEarthPeaceFund is being shaped as a bridge between rigorous research, human support, and public understanding. Its work will not begin with a predetermined technical conclusion; it will begin with clear questions, transparent methods, and people treated with dignity.
Fund reproducible work on measurement, anomaly detection, device security, exposure testing, and protective engineering. If credible mechanisms are identified, support development and open evaluation of shielding or mitigation technologies.
Develop a humane referral network for emergency shelter, practical safety planning, legal and advocacy resources, and structured documentation help for people who report being targeted or harmed.
Create accessible education on neurotechnology, consent, neural data, mental integrity, and routes for reporting concerns—without sensationalism, scapegoating, or claims that outrun evidence.
Working method: publish research questions in advance; use independent ethics and methods review; protect participant privacy; disclose conflicts; report negative as well as positive results; and separate testimony, hypothesis, and verified finding in every public document.
Get involved
The hardest public-interest problems need more than one kind of expertise. This mission is an invitation to build credible safeguards before harm is easy to create and difficult to prove.
Define testable protocols, replication standards, signal baselines, security models, and ethical participant pathways.
Turn dignity, consent, mental privacy, and bodily integrity into workable rules, oversight, and remedies.
Help design sustainable funding, governance, operations, translation, outreach, and practical support partnerships.
Explain emerging capabilities and limits accurately, examine accountability, and resist both hype and dismissal.
About
OneEarthPeaceFund was founded as a proposed mission by Hannah Wu, also known as Kacy Kagome Wu. It grows from a conviction that every person should retain agency over their own mind and body—and that protection must be built through evidence, compassion, and cooperation.
Hannah's personal story and testimony live separately at hannahwurld.com. This site keeps its focus on the technology class, public safeguards, research, victim support, and collective action.
Contact
Researchers, labs, policymakers, rights organizations, journalists, support providers, volunteers, and prospective advisors are invited to connect around the mission.
For collaboration and mission inquiries
Contact the founder through her personal site:
hannahwurld.comA dedicated OneEarthPeace contact channel will be published once the mission's governance and intake process are in place.